This is an "socialist" formula XD
So: No way. Don't like this 5th F.
The 1st Player in deliveries need won more than others. Or... what interest we have haul more than others if all gain basically the same PP?
Do you want to change the formula for more PP in EG?
Maybe like that:
PP(n) = PP(n-1) - [(10 * PP(n-1)) / (9 * (n+5))]
PP(n) = Prestige for Player in Position n
PP(n-1) = Prestige for Player in Position n-1
Ex: n= 2
PP(n-1) = PP(1) = 2199
n+5 = 2+5 = 7
so, PP(2) = PP(1) - [(10 * PP(1)) / (9 * (7))] = 2199 - [(10 * 2199) / (9 * 7)] = 1710
More difference between the 1st and the others than in your (HMR) Formula # 5, but not as much as in the current one.
but similar formulas are very unbalanced. The top 5-10 players get a big percentage of the team's prestige.
So prestige becomes antisocial!!!
And this leads to various problems (antisocial)
1) There is little incentive for the whole team to participate. The prestige of the team depends mostly on the first members.
2) Many players do not listen to the commands. They carry independently to gain much prestige. (And so they damage the whole society)
3) Creates a lot of inequality and complaints from bonus trains
4) and other
I think there should be good prestige for individual players.
But the goal must be the team play.
I have similar to your formulas ^^^