Posts by Litos SFC 6 UEL

    (Please don't shout it adds nothing to the validity or otherwise of your argument, if anything it detracts. Shouting is usually associated with irrational and belligerent thinking.)


    What is so ridiculous about reducing or stopping the use of bots to watch videos? That is a form of cheating which harms other genuine players. Anything which can be done to reduce cheating and/or exploitation, unfortunately there is a massive amount in this game, has my support.

    1. Stop being offended. I am respectful. I do not scream. Everything is in lowercase. I assume that the font size is due to copying the translator's format.

    2. Why can't I think the excuse is ridiculous? Or do I have to agree with you? I express my opinion.

    3. I say that it is a ridiculous excuse, because the solution has to be provided by the game, not at the expense of the players. We have been with errors for years, which increase with each update.

    It is my opinion. Respect at least being against the rest.

    Read this post, it's one of the many. There is also a part of an association bank.


    I repeat. The multi-account problem belongs to RN.
    Apply an idea, it will also depend on them.
    Do not detract from the idea of a partner.
    Like it more or like it less.
    And it does not deny me to think what I want about the subject in question

    To all those talking about multi-accounts, that's a Rail Nation problem.

    Because of that premise, the game should not exist. We are surrounded by multi-accounts.

    If whoever is supposed to prevent it, doesn't do it, don't criminalise those who have good ideas.

    Proposal: Lower the auction time. Whoever wins a worker's auction will have to run out of time, which would increase it from 24 hours to 48 hours, but not allowing them to choose to bid for the same worker until that time elapses. In this way, by reducing auction times, not being able to choose to bid for the same worker and increasing the enjoyment time, the rest of the associations are given the option.

    Also lowered to a maximum of 2 simultaneous workers per association.


    Propuesta: Bajar el tiempo de la subasta. Quién gane la subasta de un trabajador, tendrá que agotar el tiempo, que lo subiría de 24 horas a 48 horas pero no permitiendo optar a pujar por el mismo trabajador hasta que pase ese tiempo. De esta forma, bajando tiempos de subasta, no pudiendo optar por pujar por el mismo trabajador y subiendo el tiempo de disfrute, se da opción al resto de asociaciones.

    También bajada a un máximo de 2 trabajadores simultaneos por asociación.

    If the worker is eliminated, it will not be possible to bid again until after the worker's total time.


    Si el trabajador es eliminado, no será posible volver a pujar hasta después del tiempo total del trabajador.

    Proposal: Lower the auction time. Whoever wins a worker's auction will have to run out of time, which would increase it from 24 hours to 48 hours, but not allowing them to choose to bid for the same worker until that time elapses. In this way, by reducing auction times, not being able to choose to bid for the same worker and increasing the enjoyment time, the rest of the associations are given the option.

    Also lowered to a maximum of 2 simultaneous workers per association.


    Propuesta: Bajar el tiempo de la subasta. Quién gane la subasta de un trabajador, tendrá que agotar el tiempo, que lo subiría de 24 horas a 48 horas pero no permitiendo optar a pujar por el mismo trabajador hasta que pase ese tiempo. De esta forma, bajando tiempos de subasta, no pudiendo optar por pujar por el mismo trabajador y subiendo el tiempo de disfrute, se da opción al resto de asociaciones.

    También bajada a un máximo de 2 trabajadores simultaneos por asociación.

    One thing is data protection and another is the lack of information and transparency.

    The first I understand and accept it.

    The second no.

    And giving an explanation does not imply breach of data protection.

    For example, placing an incident for insults, which will be checked by a certain number of people, must have a conclusion, which could be "What you consider to be an insult, we do not understand as such". I have lived that example. It has been reported and there has been no penalty. The same meaning of insult in some countries may be different in others. For example, in Spanish, some words are insults in some countries and not in others. Who and why determines that it is or is not? That is the information that has to be given. And it is nothing that violates the law.

    It would be nice to put restrictions for the final game.

    I think that it should count as an active player, the one who has at least played since the beginning of era 5.

    That he has built roads to industries.

    Have a level of prestige for continued climb, for having built the station buildings in a percentage within the 2 eras until the final game.

    Be connected to least 3 peripheral cities.

    That would give strength to those who have really played all the time.

    I fully agree with what / Muhai says regarding the lack of information when it is reported.

    Without wanting to go into the methods they use, I think they should be more transparent.

    When a complaint is made, at least one must have a response, at least, coherent and empathetic.

    Why can't the person making the complaint be given an explanation privately?

    This explanation must include at least comments regarding whether or not what is denounced is true. And an explanation of the conclusion, although no internal details are given. It is the least you deserve.


    ** I don't speak and write English well. I have translated it by Google translator from Spanish.

    Having a plus account with the insured bonus, and not receiving it is worse, and what would be possible claims of deceptive advertising, paying for something you do not receive, etc., etc.

    They have found a correct and temporary solution with the option of 5 seconds without viewing videos.


    Tener cuenta plus con el bono asegurado, y no recibirlo es peor, y lo que supondría posibles reclamaciones de publicidad engañosa, pagar por algo que no recibes, etc, etc.

    Han encontrado una solución correcta y temporal con la opción de 5 segundos sin visualización de vídeos.

    I would leave it as is.

    But I bring a possibility. That the location be delimited to two regions, at most 3.

    Any player should only be able to connect 10 (15) cities, 2 (3) regions, both adjacent to the home region. And they could not connect with the second region until they had connected the 5 cities of their native region. (With the third, until you have the 10 cities)

    With that, I think there would be fewer birds flying in search of prestige and they would work more on monuments and cities mainly.

    Greetings.

    Hi

    Other games featuring auction mechanics add some more time (e.g. 30sec) after the last bid so that interested bidders could react. Now it is not an auction but a last second steal. :cursing:

    It is annoying that someone else can bid just 1$ more in the last second and steal the worker because I have no chance to react. I would call it not an auction but a mockery.

    Bet hard from the start and don't be stingy, so you might win.